2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
denis_ireri 83ec5ecd36 Enforce tenant isolation in the data layer instead of per route
Every route had to remember to add the business filter to every query;
nothing stopped one that forgot. The audit for this change found several
that had: the M-Pesa status re-check, the stock ledger's duplicate checks,
the daily-inventory and branch-price upserts, a cash-sale replay lookup,
several load-by-id lookups, and every populate().

- tenantGuard: a Mongoose plugin on all ten business-scoped models. Any
  find/update/delete/count/distinct, or an aggregate whose first stage is
  not a $match, that does not pin exactly one businessId throws
  TenantScopeError before reaching the database ($in, $exists and other
  operators do not count).
- crossTenant("reason", fn): the explicit, documented exemption for the
  queries that must span businesses - login's email lookup, refresh and
  invite-token lookups, the M-Pesa callback, the platform console and the
  maintenance scripts. git grep crossTenant lists them all.
- scopedPopulate: populated branch, product and staff names are also
  restricted to the business.
- Every flagged query site now names the business (or is exempted with a
  reason).
- Tests: a check that every model with a businessId field carries the
  guard; the guard refusing unscoped queries of every kind; and a route
  sweep where business A sends business B's ids to every read route
  (nothing of B's comes back) and every write route (all refused, B's
  data unchanged). Test-side database inspections go through db(), an
  explicit test exemption. Removing one route's business filter makes the
  suite fail.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 11:52:35 +03:00
denis_ireri ee5bb5beb8 Stop simultaneous transfers from overdrawing a branch
A transfer read the sending branch's stock and then wrote its movements
as two separate steps. Requests arriving together all saw the same
balance and all passed the check: five simultaneous transfers of 4 from
a stock of 10 all succeeded, sending 20.

The check and the write now run under withStockLock: a short lease on
one product's stock at one branch, taken with a single atomic upsert
(it only succeeds when no unexpired lease exists) and released when the
request finishes. A second request waits briefly, then sees the updated
balance; after 5 seconds it gets 409 "try again". A lease expires after
10 seconds, so a crashed request cannot block the stock for good.

Physical counts take the same lock, so a count is never computed from a
balance a transfer is changing. A double-tapped transfer that races
itself still moves stock once. Sales do not take the lock: they are
recorded even when stock runs out, by design.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 10:57:17 +03:00